Posted 2/6/2018 by admin

Error Hy000 Datadirect Odbc Sybase Wire Protocol Driver Timeout Exceeded

Error Hy000 Datadirect Odbc Sybase Wire Protocol Driver Timeout Exceeded Rating: 5,8/10 7873votes

Sep 20, 2011. [ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver]Timeout exceeded. Error message. I've already gone into ODBC. DataDirect 5.1 Sybase Wire Protocol to. ERROR [HY000] [DataDirect][ODBC Progress. 11g DB and are using the DataDirect Oracle Wire Protocol ODBC drivers. [ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver].

Category: None Tags:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, I run a c# process and in the middle of the night this happens: ERROR [HY000][DataDirect][ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver] Timeout exceeded I know for sure that the database is always active! But this keeps happening! Do you how can I fix this error? Thanks in advance! EDIT: is there a way to put the timeout four times bigger?

You may be interested in these articles: • • • • • 52 comments Positive Reverse • 2013-07-07 22:45:08. I do not think that the security of your source code is a good reason to choose between C # and Delphi. If you create an.Net executable you can protect it with a tool like, on the othe hand the win32 executables are by definition very difficult to disassemble (get the original source code) unless you include debug information in them. You should compare other features, in my opinion you should use the language with which you feel more comfortable and you have more skills. In my case it always chooses delphi, because it has an excellent and fast compiler and thousands of third party components and in addition to generating executables without dependencies.;) You can check this question Also you can check this list of applications built with Delphi Among them,,. • 2013-07-07 23:03:08. As with most of the posts here, I would agree that security is in how you write the program.

Not is what language you use. I use several different languages, depending on the project. On top of asking your self which you would be more comfortable with, you should ask your self if you want to support multiple platforms. My company does a lot of cross-platform development, and as such, we don't use C# on those projects. There is the mono project that aims to allow.net code to run on mac and Linux, but between the two, Delphi, being pascal is somewhat more portable. ( On our cross platform projects, we use either C or C++ ) • 2013-07-08 02:27:08.

The answer you reference misses much of the point of Visitor. It says 'visitors are used to implement type-testing without sacrificing type-safety', which is simply incorrect. The GOF book says 'visitors let you define a new operation without changing the classes of the elements on which it operates'. Visitors can certainly be used for testing objects on things other than type, and for carrying out operations on objects that don't involve testing.

'Visitor is overkill' is frequently stated, but it's usually said by people trying to use Visitor for things it wasn't intended for, and then finding that -surprise - it doesn't really work for it. The poster is right in that the second piece of code they quote is a much easier way of implementing the functionality, but it misses the point in that Visitor is intended for when you don't want to modify the Fruit class. • 2013-07-08 03:53:08.

Agree with Denis - this depends on how your data is stored. I'd suggest you implement your hierarchy using the. You can then very easily check if a row is a descendent of another row using DECLARE @searchId HierarchyId -- select your id SELECT @searchId = HierarchyId FROM Devices WHERE DeviceId = 1 SELECT * FROM Devices WHERE -- not children DeviceHierarchyId.IsDescendantOf(@seachId) = 0 -- not parents AND @searchId.IsDescendantOf(DeviceHierarchyId) = 0 edit To briefly explain the HierarchyId datatype and how this would work, consider that each item has a place in a hierarchy under a root node.

Htc Explorer A310e Pc Suite Free Download. (If you have multiple natural roots, you would place each root under a super-root). Each hierarchyid column stores the complete hierarchical position of item. For example Id ParentId HierarchyId 1 null 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 4 3 1 3 4 and so on. To check whether an item is a child of another, simply check whether the hierarchyId is contained within the other row's hierarchyId - e.g.

4 is a child of 3 because the entire 1 3 is contained within it's hierarchyId 1 3 4, but 4 is not a child of 2 because 1 2 is not contained within the hierarchyId. To see whether an itemA is a parent of itemB, check whether itemB is a child of itemA. Finally, you don't actually need to do any comparisons. The TSQL HierarchyId type contains a number of methods, one of which is the IsDescendantOf method that I've highlighted above. So a usage like hierarcyId1.IsDescendantOf(hierarchyId2) performs the kind of check that I've described here. The hierarchyIds are binary and are compared very quickly in the database. I would use hierarchyId whenever possible when dealing with a database hierarchy.